This is not the Kellerman you're used to.
I should get that out of the way first, because if you're picking this up expecting Alex Delaware and Milo Sturgis cracking skulls in L.A., you're going to be confused about thirty minutes in. Crime Scene is Jonathan Kellerman teaming up with his son Jesse, and the result is something quieter, more methodical, and โ depending on your patience level โ either refreshingly cerebral or frustratingly slow.
I landed somewhere in the middle. Finished it on a long drive back from a client site in San Antonio, Ranger snoring in the back seat, and I'll say this: the book kept me company without ever making me white-knuckle the steering wheel.
A Coroner Who Actually Thinks Like One
Clay Edison is an interesting protagonist. Former college basketball star turned deputy coroner in Alameda County โ not a cop, not a PI, not a special forces operator with a mysterious past. He examines dead bodies. That's it. And the Kellermans lean into that distinction hard, which I respect. Clay doesn't have a weapon, doesn't have arrest authority, and when he starts poking around Walter Rennert's death, he's doing it on his own time with zero institutional backing. The line from the book โ "When I meet new people, they're usually dead" โ tells you everything about his worldview. Dry, detached, clinical.
Rennert's death looks simple. Old professor, bad ticker, too much bourbon, falls down his stairs. Case closed. Except his daughter Tatiana starts pushing Clay to look deeper, and what unravels is a decades-old psychology experiment gone sideways, a murdered college student, and a pattern of deaths among Rennert's former colleagues that's too neat to be coincidence.
The procedural details feel right. The Kellermans clearly did their homework on coroner operations โ how bodies get processed, the bureaucratic turf wars between coroners and police, the limitations of what a death investigator can actually do versus what TV tells you they do. I've worked with enough law enforcement and forensic professionals to appreciate when someone gets the chain of custody stuff right instead of hand-waving it away. That same procedural honesty โ the unglamorous machinery of how death actually gets investigated โ is what made Notes on an Execution stick with me long after I finished it, though that one cuts deeper and leaves a mark.
Dennis Boutsikaris Carries the Weight
Let me cut to the chase on the narration: Boutsikaris is the reason this audiobook works as well as it does. His read of Clay is measured, slightly sardonic, with just enough warmth to keep the character from feeling robotic. Where he really earns his paycheck is in the supporting cast โ there's a recurring bit with an unhappy man who keeps calling about his recently deceased father, and Boutsikaris nails the escalating frustration in those exchanges with perfect comic timing. It's a small thing, but it breaks up the slower stretches and shows a narrator who understands that humor in a mystery isn't about mugging, it's about timing.
His differentiation between characters is solid without being showy. You always know who's talking. At 1.25x he sounds completely natural โ no distortion, no rushing โ which tells me the original recording pace was deliberate and controlled.
Where the Mission Goes Sideways
Here's the thing, though. This is where it lost me a bit. The Clay-Tatiana romance feels like it was bolted on because somebody said "the protagonist needs a love interest." She's the dead man's daughter. He's investigating her father's death. The conflict of interest is obvious and the book acknowledges it, but then doesn't do much interesting with that tension. It just... happens. And the ending โ I won't spoil it โ but after nine-plus hours of careful, methodical buildup, the resolution arrives with all the impact of a PowerPoint presentation. Abrupt. Anticlimactic. Like a patrol that spends twelve hours setting up an ambush only to have the target take a different road.
The pacing issue is real. This is a slow burn, and I don't mind slow burns when they're building toward something that justifies the investment. Here, the payoff ratio felt off. Good setup, middling execution on the landing.
Worth Your Time? Here's the Debrief
If you want a mystery that respects procedure, gives you a protagonist who isn't a superhero, and doesn't rely on gore or gunfights โ this is a solid pick. It's the antithesis of the Jack Reacher approach, and that's not a complaint, just a classification. Linda would probably like this one more than I did, honestly.
But if you need your thrillers to actually thrill? If you want an ending that makes the slow middle worth it? You might finish this feeling like you ate a decent meal but can't remember what you ordered.
Ranger slept through the whole thing. Make of that what you will.
Good for a long drive or quiet evening. Not the book that'll make you miss your exit.
















